Top 5 Mobile Application Development Companies For Customers and Enterprises

The growing demand of mobiles have necessitated almost majority of customers and enterprises globally to seek for app solutions in order to enhance their revenues. However, picking the best from rest of the pack may prove hectic for many. So, here is the list of top 5 companies for your glance that have phenomenally helped infinite startups and giants.

Mobile conquers the world! Of course, no one can deny this fact. Recent surveys and reports point out exactly to the evolution of mobiles and everything related to these compact handheld devices. As mobile and their accessories have become integral part of our most of our lives, the surge in the field of mobile application development doesn’t surprise many! Mobile apps are making giant strides into almost all industry sectors and they have achieved solid responses from consumers as well as enterprises. App development has completely changed humankind and the style of life as apps offer tremendous convenience and sophistication while allowing to access data on the go. As a result, to meet the growing demand, today, there are infinite iPhone and Android mobile apps development companies competing in the space to draw the eyeballs of customers worldwide. Here, I’ve hand-picked the top 5 best mobile application development companies using which deliver high-quality app solutions to customers worldwide.

Kony with more than 70+ Fortune clients is one of the top-notch application platform and pre-built apps provider. Their specialty is the ability to raise apps that work smoothly across multiple channels and major OSs with perfection. It really has a very good clientele and impressive apps that can amuse most users.

When it comes to realizing user desires on apps and meeting their expectations, is not too far away! Their forward-looking thinking and out-of-the-box designing have most customers and enterprises generate massive revenues. If developing mobile app at a quick pace with absolute quality is your agenda, this company can deliver the goods for you.

Since its inception at 2007, with the pliable and accessible app development process, Intellectsoft has the ability to revolutionize the mobile world with some top-quality apps. Their value-driven business model and client commitment are other prospects that have helped most enterprisers and users around the world trust this company for end-to-end customer solutions.

Contus is a fast-growing mobility, web and cloud solution provider to customers worldwide. The popular 4D Application development process for the iOS and Android customers and enterprises is a huge bonus and has the ability to transform revenues from low-to-high with absolute ease. They have assisted countless startups and corporate giants with their idea-led apps for better business performances.

Mubaloo is a UK-based enterprise and customer app development company with global clientele. With their mobile strategy expert app developers, Mubaloo has raised some incredible apps that have helped in the process of improving the revenue of a lot of enterprises. This company has been awarded National Business Award for their excellent app development ability.


Travel Abroad for Volunteer Jobs

Voyaging abroad is an incredible approach to learn and encounter things you can’t discover them in your own particular nation. In any case, voyaging is feverish and needs a ton of arrangements and courses of action. To make your voyaging simple, fun and valuable, consider voyaging abroad as a volunteer with different volunteers. This is an incredible approach to an intriguing spot on the planet and win experience, help other people and work on economical ventures. This offer is by all accounts exceptionally tempting as it includes numerous advantages. For your travel costs and courses of action you can contact with any great NGO and register yourself as an intrigued volunteer. When you are acknowledged, you will be sent to any of the African nations or others to join ventures opened for the welfare of local people.

The most effective method to Start Your Planning

So as to go to a spot in Africa where you can join volunteer projects effortlessly, begin anticipating your go ahead of time. It is great that you begin a couple of months prior. To start with you search for philanthropy associations that are effectively working and furnishing individuals in Africa with their administrations. These associations are all around sorted out and can organize gatherings of volunteers and dispatch them to those spots where their help is required. One of these NGOs is Thrive Africa. Their bundles are flexible and you have the chance to get your travel costs financed by backers. While you enroll for the volunteer projects, check the point by point data where to go and what projects to join. Gather data about the neighborhood climate of the spot you need to go and find about society of the general population too. Early arrangement spares you from squandering valuable time. You can make the best utilization of plentiful time with you and pick your preferred projects to join.


Bacall Associates – Simple Tips for Making Travel more Affordable

Thusly, they could unwind and appreciate the miracles of voyaging. They additionally need to keep valuable recollections of their travel with the goal that they’ll have something to treasure until the end of time. Each of us may have distinctive motivations to travel yet a few of us, particularly in Western nations, don’t have sufficient energy to travel and make tracks in an opposite direction from their bustling universes.

A few organizations comprehend this need of each person, that is the reason they’re giving their representatives free excursions to help them rest for some time to help them work all the more productively once they return. Notwithstanding, not all organizations resemble this since they need their representatives to work more for them yet pay them less. That aside, Bacall Associates ensure that voyaging can be truly modest, and fun and restoring in the meantime.

Do you want to travel so much yet you don’t have enough time and cash to isn’t that right? Stress no more in light of the fact that Bacall Associates will share some cash sparing tips that can help you go to the spot you need. You can believe the association’s judgment since it is an eminent boutique PR, showcasing and deals bolster office that spends significant time in go at the top end of the business sector. Subsequent to understanding this article, you will never pardon yourself from voyaging any longer.

Stay in youth inns

In case you’re a youthful explorer, it’s frequently a smart thought to stay in youth lodgings to spare cash. Try not to give yourself a chance to suffocate into the wrong thoughts or myths about youth inns since this sort of spot permit youthful souls to see the world without spending a lot of cash since they’re reasonable to stay in. You’ll likewise get an opportunity to meet new individuals who are doing likewise as you. Yet, since you’re staying in an adolescent inn, you ought to practice additional alert in view of wellbeing reasons.

Book ahead of time

On the off chance that you can deal with your excursion well ahead of time, then it really is ideal since this will give you the best estimating particularly in case you’re going to go amid occasions. Bacall Associates dependably prescribes booking ahead of time to ensure that you can get the best rebates where you can set aside to 80%.

Get a regular customer card

You can score a free ticket or two with this particular card and you can likewise save money on airfare, contingent upon how regularly you travel. It will be better in case you’re going to do your own exploration on each long standing customer clubs accessible to you. A few clubs are centered around the normal family while others are pointed towards agents. Before picking the best club for you, ensure that you did an intensive research and considered each imperative subtle element.

You can likewise hang out in airplane terminal parlors that are solely made for aircraft cardmembers. You can unwind in this sort of spot and loosen up from the feverish airplane terminal. Be that as it may, this regularly requires a yearly expense, so it’s dependent upon you to choose on the off chance that it’s justified regardless of the cash or not.

Obtain a business related travel

It is infrequently hard to have a period off in the event that you need to travel, however in the event that you tell your supervisor that your travel is business related, then there’s a chance that you can get a period off. In case you’re an instructor, you can report back to your manager on what you have realized amid your travel, simply ensure that you generally look for instructive open doors in your trek.

The rules examined above are probably the most essential techniques that you can use to travel increasingly and experience the world. Bacall Associates trusts that you will have all the more energizing undertakings later on.


A Review of PowerDVD Linux – expensive, but just works

PowerDVD Linux has been around for years. Originally sold only to embedded Linux developers, the software made its way onto the desktop by being included by hardware makers in Dell’s Ubuntu laptops and more recently Asus eeePCs.

The software is now finally available to the general Ubuntu-using public via The Ubuntu Store.

As a rule, we generally don’t like a lot of proprietary software – not for any ethical reason, but because a lot of proprietary Linux apps are crap, with weird installers, no menu entries, EULAs in pop up terminals, and unnecessary requests to reboot.

On the other hand. Totem requires some setup (although it works out of the box if you use Ubuntu derivative Linux Mint) and at its best seems to use incorrect colors, giving a slightly yellowish tinge to the picture. MPlayer has a horrible UI, and frequently has issues with menus, chapters and subtitles.

We took a gamble and purchased on PowerDVD Linux. It’s expensive – $50 US (24 pounds UK) – and we were quite prepared to trash the software as publicly as we could if it failed to live up to expectations – which we expected it to do.

We were pleasantly surprised.


PowerDVD Linux comes properly packaged for Ubuntu. Click the deb, install it, and click Applications → Sound and Video → PowerDVD Linux to launch the app.

Desktop Integration

The app installs itself as the default player for film DVDs. This means when you pop in a DVD movie, Ubuntu will ask if you’d like to play it with PowerDVD,.and when you browse a DVD that has a movie on it, Nautilus will ask if you’d like to play the film.

The app will also automatically start if you insert a video DVD, resuming the film where you left off.

PowerDVD works with Compiz, but will switch to Metacity when it starts and resume Compiz when it exits. The switch is seamless and you don’t have to do anything.

Asides from the on-screen UI shown above, hitting Esc during a film, or starting the app without a disc in the drive, will bring up the regular UI shown below. The regular UI is simple, and contains various options for tweaking color correction and switching between stereo and Dolby surround. Thankfully, it avoids the ‘chromed-up-car-stereo-ala-WinAmp-1996′ looks that a lot of DVD players have.

Playing Movies

We a wide variety of films and found subtitles, languages, and menus worked fine.

Colors are great out of the box. There’s a color menu for those that would like to tweak, but we didn’t need to.

Rewind and fast forward work well, with 2x to 16x speed We’d like to have seen more frames when playing at 16x speed, however. Also note that since PowerDVD is a licensed DVD Consortium product, it refuses to skip some advertisements and copyright notices if the disc maker has requested to prevent you from doing these things. Most discs aren’t quite so annoying, however.


In normal usage, the app was fine. In our torture test, playing a badly scratched DVD had the following results:

Shock After shaking the laptop violently, our disc resumed playing.
Mildly scratched disc Was not noticable.
Very badly scratched disc Stopped playing. We had to hit ESC to return to the main menu, and restart the disc from there.

PowerDVD Linux never crashed on either test.


As much as we hate to say this, PowerDVD is damn nice. There was no setup required, and it was reliable as all hell. While some distros (eg, Linux Mint) come out of the box with Open-Source DVD players, PowerDVDs colors simply looked a lot better. None of the weird stuff – automatic playing, subtitles, menuing, slow motion – was a problem.

The app simply got out of the way and let us enjoy our film.

At $49 US, it’s damn expensive, but we don’t regret our purchase at all.


A light hearted look at the great format wars of our time

Another great format war ended this week, with Blu-Ray to 70% of released films and, according to the Financial Times, HD-DVD left with one major studio. HD-DVD owners are either mildly put out, or happy they can now pick up HD movies for a few dollars as they’re tossed out by major retailers.

We’ve been here before: whether RealPlayer versus Windows Media, BSD versus Linux, or boxers versus briefs. Let’s take a look back at some of the great format wars of our time.

We should first clarify what we mean by losing. Losing a war doesn’t mean the technologies or formats are bad (though sometimes they are). This doesn’t mean the technologies aren’t in use either. It just means they’re no longer the default solution for their area. Every article on the death of ColdFusion was filled with angry developers pointing out new release of ColdFusion as an example of how alive the language was. But ColdFusion developers are scarce, it’s rarely chosen for new projects, and its no longer viewed as a mainstream web development language like PHP. ColdFusion lost the technology war. Deal with it.

Metric versus Imperial

The war to end all wars. Until the 1960’s, imperial rocked the world, and students spent a great deal of time learning to convert fonoobularsers into schmeekulars. Since then, however, everywhere but Myanmar, Libya and, er, the USA have switched to metric, with unfortunate consequences for polar landers everywhere.
Winner: Metric
Loser: Polar landers

Word and WordPerfect
PCs were DOS, GUIs were for children, and WordPerfect was the wordprocessor.But then Windows came out, and due to a sweet combo deal for PC makers shipping MS-DOS, Windows 3 now came with most PCs. Sure, you could run WordPerfect for DOS, but Microsoft had a pretty damn good version of Word for Windows that could read WordPerfect files. Alas for WordPerfect, patenting file formats wasn’t invented back then, so WordPerfect had to stand on its own two rather smelly feet. By the time a decent GUI WordPerfect came out, nobody cared. A few years later, Microsoft bundled WinWord with its other.
Winner: Word

Netscare versus Internet Explorer In the mid 90’s years Netscape was the internet for a lot of people. Microsoft were still touting their (then proprietary, not internet based) MSN as the sensible alternative to the internet.

But then something changed. Bill Gates sent a memo to everyone in Microsoft about a coming Internet tidal wave. So in the late 90s and early noughties, Microsoft did everything they possibly could to better Netscape. Making their browser free, gluing the browser into the Windows file manager and desktop, and pleasing developers by pushing ahead with standards support that ate Netscape’s for breakfast.

Meanwhile, Netscape did everything to annoy it users. Netscape put a ’shop’ button next to ’stop’, and while having Open Sourced its code to create the Mozilla project, Netscape seemed to have missed the whole ‘release early, release often’ tenant of that movement – the company didn’t release a major new version of Netscape for 5 years after Netscape 4 shipped. In a forward war, Netscape apparently forgot to add ‘compete’ to its to-do list. IE market share went from 20% market share in 96 to 80% in 2000.
The winner: Internet Explorer.

RealPlayer and Windows Media Player

In the late 90s, a former Microsoft executive sees the internet coming, and starts creating a first-to-market streaming audio and video system that works on every platform, is free, included with the most popular web browser. The model is simple:charges companies for the authoring tools to create files, and provide a better version of the player to paid customers. Microsoft itself has no idea about the internet at the time and does not respond for years.

So why did RealPlayer lose? They did everything possible to annoy their customers. In 1999, the free player, hidden to this day in Real’s website, was pimped out to spyware companies like Comet Cursor. That same year the world realized the software sent a list of everything each user played back to RealNetworks. Meantime, the free player kept harassing you with popup advertisements, while you were using other software. Muting RealPlayer stopped all other sound applications from playing (a problem that persists to this day). During installation, RealPlayer asked if it could bone your sister, and if you unticked the box, it did it anyway. OK we made that last one up. We think.

Windows Media Player took advantage of Microsoft’s desktop monopoly to get onto everyone’s desktop, and stayed there because it didn’t suck.
Winner: Windows Mobile


Sure, there were vast technical differences, but nobody cared. In the early 2000s, most could burn either the DVD Forum backed DVD-RW (supported by Apple and Pioneer) or DVD+RW, supported by HP, Dell and Microsoft. DVD-RW cracked first, converting to Hybrid DVD+/-RW drives a couple of years before everyone else did.
The winner: +RW. But the victory didn’t last long.

Internet Explorer versus Firefox

By 2003 Netscape was dead. Without any good competition (apart from the great-but-still unpopular Opera) Internet Explorer hadn’t been updated in a couple of years, and Microsoft, having no need to attract developers, stopped caring about standards support. Sure, there was Mozilla, but it was an ugly, slow, bloated mess.

In 2003 Firefox was announced to the world with a two page spread in the New York Times. Firefox didn’t look like another web browser. It had a more minimal design: one toolbar, with only the basic navigation controls placed beside the location bar, and, handily tabs underneath.It was snappy and responsive, and the ability to block annoying flashing images and popup advertising were standard features. It also had great standard support.

In late 2006, five years after IE6, Internet Explorer 7 came out. Its has a more minimal design: one toolbar, with only the basic navigation controls placed beside the location bar, and, handily tabs underneath.It’s snappy and responsive, and the ability to block annoying flashing images and popup advertising are standard features. It also has improved standard support.

That wasn’t enough though: from 2004 to the present, Internet Explorer’s market share has been in slow, steady decline. While Firefox may only be around 20% of computer users worldwide, it’s clear which browser is setting the agenda for web browser development.
Winner: Firefox

Handheld Devices: Windows Mobile versus Palm

After Apple’s Newton failed to take off, Palm was first to popularize the PDA. Microsoft saw the opportunity, and came out with, er, Palm-Sized PCs, before getting their ass handed to them on a plate. Later rebranding to Windows CE and then Windows Mobile, Microsoft differentiated from Palm’s strictly-business devices by giving users color screens and multmedia support. The Windows Mobile applications didn’t share much code with their desktop counterparts – editing a document in Word Mobile still removes most of the formatting, and Pocket IE can’t show most websites properly – but the brand recognition were strong enough to sway users to Windows Mobile. Microsoft licensed their OS to all and sundry, and while HP came out with some great iPAQs, the cleverly namd High Tech Computer (now just HTC), emerged from obscurity with a variety of innovate devices to become the most popular maker of PDAs. Palm, meanwhile, did…not much at all.
Winner: Windows Mobile

Web Development: Microsoft Stack vs LAMP

Once upon a time, there was ASP. It was web development for VB coders back when VB was the easy choice for web apps, and merely required a license for a server platform with a spotty security record that needed to be restarted for every security update. But the market leading web server was generally deployed on Unix platforms, which already shipped PHP, and either MySQL or PostgreSQL, and had a better reputation for security and maintenance. Sure, ASP still exists, but it’s now a language for Microsoft-obsessed corporates, and virtually unheard of in the startup space. See for yourself what the current crop of web 2.0 sites use, then visit the Y Combinator news forums and realize nothing’s about to change.
Winner: LAMP

Open Source Desktops: GNOME and KDE

KDE was the older, more polished desktop. GNOME was a weird acronym, whose main features were being brown, having this icon, and changing its internals every five seconds (Enlightenment, Sawfish, Metacity, a plastic banana). GNOME got some traction because Red Hat and Debian didn’t like KDE’s reliance of QT, which would have required proprietary app developers to pay a licensing fee to Trolltech. This eventually changed, but meanwhile GNOME had started to improve – and become the basis for Evolution, one of the first mail clients on any platform to include bayesian filtering and smart folders. The major Open Source web browsers, Mozilla and then Firefox, also used the GTK theme to varying levels.

A few years later, Ubuntu was created from Debian. Fedora was created from Red Hat. Then SuSE brought GNOME boosters Ximian, and switched from GNOME to KDE as default. Now: the most popular Linux desktops, Ubuntu, Fedora and OpenSuSE, use GNOME by default. Meanwhile KDE spends its days convincing people that, er, 4.0 doesn’t mean 4.
Winner: GNOME

Open Source Operating Systems: BSD vs Linux

BSD took Unix, a popular proprietary operating system requiring proprietary hardware, and made it available for free on x86 under an Open Source license. It existed before Linux did, and for the first few years Linux came along, and was technically superior in many ways, with securelevels, dependency based packaging, fantastic firewalling, and good documentation, before these features (or their equivalents) existed for Linux.

The only think it lacked was by design: BSD was licensed to allow anybodyo do pretty much anything they want with it, including take the source code and improve it without releasing the improvements back. Folks loved the license, and took advantage of it – BSD’s networking code and IP utilities ended up in Windows NT, other utilities ended up in NetApp Filers, and a bunch of other embedded firewalls are based on the entire OS.

Today, lots of people use BSD code. They use it in proprietary applications, have no idea who created it, and have no idea that BSD exists as an Open Source general purpose operating system. Meanwhile, the GPL license of Linux attracted more developers, creating better software, in turn attracting more developers. Linux now does everything that was unique to BSD, a lot more it doesn’t.
Winner: BSD. Just kidding.

Windows Media Player and Flash Video

Windows Media Player trounced Real, and seemed unstoppable. Meanwhile, Flash – which, as an essential plugin, also came with Windows, along with the growing-in-popularity Firefox and OSX’s Safari, quietly added Sorenson Sparc video support. Suddenly Flash wasn’t just a plugin for animation and sound, but a video platform.

The timing was great. The web video scene was starting to expand rapidly, now that users finally had the connections to handle it. Flash was easier to update than Windows Media Player, and the quality was great – to the point Apple (who make the less popular Quicktime) sued Sorenson, the codec provider, claiming that Sorenson’s technologies were licensed exclusively to them. Subsequent updates added new and better codecs. The plugin updated itself, and after a couple of years Flash video support was everywhere.

In 2005 Youtube and Revver (and a plethora of wannabes) came along, basing their business models on the new format. In the last year, ever major video site has been based on Flash Video – and none on Windows Media.

Winner: Flash

Disagree? Think we’ve missed a format war? Really, really, like Realplayer, and your sister can date who she wants? Comments below as usual.


What’s broken with Unix? How would you fix it? Part I

The question above is the only question on Google Labs Aptitude Test that relates to an Operating System. It’s a good question: it immediately gets rid of fanboys who can’t see anything wrong with any tool they love, and allows people who are passionate and knowledgeable enough about Unix to demonstrate the can either:

  • see Unix’s faults
  • tell Google they prefer Unix in uppercase, just like MULTICS was.

This is part one of a multipart series, published over the next two weeks. This week: text processing.

Part I: Text Processing

There are plenty of Unix gurus who make arguments about separating content from presentation when discussing structured formats (like Tex) over Microsoft Word. The same argument applies to the shell.

  • Commands don’t return structured information. They return text marked as either output or errors. Errors are accompanied by error codes to help determine the type of error. There is a vague convention a few tools follow to determine the type of output into warnings and information using [WW] and [II], but it’s not particularly popular. There is no standard field separator. To find particular data in your output, you’re forced to think about where this data exists in your output. For example, getting interface names and IP addresses out of ifconfig:ifconfig | egrep -o ‘^[a-z0-9]{1,12}|inet addr:[0-9.]+’
  • Each new tool has a separate config file format, that need users to learn it and software to parse it. This places additional burden on tools developers, who often do horrible things like store configuration in their own files, causing data loss when they filed modified by other methods are overwritten. Red Hat did this a lot – system-config-named would overwrite BIND’s own configuration files (does anyone know if Red Hat still do this). Yes it was terrible, especially from a company that ships and is responsible for both the config tools and the app. But it’s quite hard to create a new parser for every new file format.
  • Adding information breaks parsers. For example, it’d be handy for ifconfig to show an ethernet card’s link status and speed, or the child cards used by bonded interfaces. Yet adding this information can break existing scripts that rely on the current presentation – so you have one tool to check the current IP address and the transfer and receive counters, etc. and another tool to check the link status and speed. It’s terribly inefficient.
  • Text editors don’t handle structured information. This is why people complain when a config file is in XML. Yes, it’s horrible to edit, but that’s because vi isn’t built for XML. vi has keyboard macros to delete characters, words, lines and paragraphs. You can’t delete a Samba share declaration, or an Apache virtual host. You can’t copy a share declaration to another share declaration. Or skip to the next tag enclosed value. Instead, you must treat these items as characters, paragraphs, or strings, rather than objects they are.

So how to fix this?

  • Allow users to fetch particular information from output and config files by specifying what they want, rather than its location. So:ifconfig |egrep -o ‘^[a-z0-9]{1,12}|inet addr:[0-9.]+’becomesinterfaces | filter name ipaddress
  • A smart shell can complete ‘name’ and ‘ipaddress’ after a few characters, since it knows all the available fields that interfaces’ returns.This is similar to the object pipelining that Perl 6, Powershell, and Hotwire allow.
  • Allow output to work as input. So I can save the current interface settings of a system to a config file, or another system.
  • Allow editing tools to treat content as content – adding, copying, and deleting deleting sections, variables and values, rather than treating them as a series of characters, lines or paragraphs. Sure, deleting paragraphs makes vi nice and fast. But not as fast as if you could delete rows, columns, and sections.
  • Take advantage of modern displays through user configurable stylesheets. Allow proper highlighting of errors and warnings, or have intermediate records shown in different colors, or have headings shown as headings. This is something Hotwire already does.
  • Allow better reporting (config to documentation) or building (turning documentation to config) by using XML as the base format. This doesn’t mean you ever have to see any actual XML code – remember, editing tools should treat content as content – see GConf and DConf for examples. It should be easy to build a machine from an word processing document specifying the machines configuration. Or build a simple document from a hosts next time someone asks for a report of some kind.
  • Mandatory documentation of all settings as part of the schema. This allows all kinds of exciting possibilities, such as contextual help – see a definition of what you’re editing. Gconf and the upcoming DConf do this too.
  • A hierarchical structure, for simple organization and other exciting concepts like settings mounts, to allow easy sharing of configuration between machines – again, see Gconf.

That’s it for this week. Have your own thoughts on a designing a better shell? Played with Perl 6, Powershell or Hotwire? What do you think of GConf? Comments are below as usual.

Tune in next week for part II.